"subscribe all" wrote:

>I sincerley wish,good luck to Bela Liptak,who apparently does not have
>anything else to do,just pester the List with his constant demands for
action.
>Personaly once I see his name on my mail,I just automaticly delete them.

And there may be others on this list who automatically delete anything such
as the above half-literate tirade.

Ferenc

Joe Szalai wrote:

> Aniko,
>
> When an employee gets a 2 per cent wage increase and the 'cost of living'
> increases by 5 per cent, is the employee better off?  It's a simple
> question and your respsonse seems to indicate that, yes, the employee is
> better off.  Think about it again.  It's not that difficult of a concept.

  Cute, but not very realistic, as usual, Joe.  Since when do things
happen
in a vacuum? The concept seems to be very difficult for you.
  I am wondering what has made you so bitter that there is nothing
positive
in your postings. It couldn't be your Marxist approach to things,  not
even
Marxists are so bitter.
                        Amos

Joe Szalai wrote:
>
> At 09:21 PM 7/5/97 -0400, "Amos J. Danube" in "Re: Hungarians Beware - Joe
> is around! - " wrote:
>
> >Finally I have discovered why Joe is so intent to prove his Hungarian
> >ancestry: he can whine a lot and be  as pessimistic as any Hungarian.
> >Or is this only a sympathy whining and pessimism?
>
> Amos,
>
> I, Szalai Jozsef, don't have to prove my Hungarian ancestry.  I know that
> my name isn't as Hungarian as "Amos J. Danube", but it's the only name I
> have.  How about you, Amos?
>
> Joe Szalai

Joe,

   I haven't said anything about anybody's name, and you know it. So
what
about me, Joe? This is the  best you can  come up with?  Nothing to
argue
with, attack! Hm! It is not even original. Better luck next time!
Others
have tried it and have fallen on their faces.
                                               Amos

At 06:50 PM 7/6/97 -0400, Andy Kozma wrote:
>At 06:30 PM 7/6/97 -0400, you wrote:
>>"subscribe all" wrote:
>>
>>>I sincerley wish,good luck to Bela Liptak,who apparently does not have
>>>anything else to do,just pester the List with his constant demands for
>>action.
>>>Personaly once I see his name on my mail,I just automaticly delete them.
>>
>>And there may be others on this list who automatically delete anything such
>>as the above half-literate tirade.
>>
>>Ferenc
>>
>>Please you total literate just do so.You seems to be on cloud nine ferenc.
>Just stay there with your smirk,and smut.
>Andy Kozma

        The knowledge of the English language doesn't always guarantee a
decent human being. ESB

At 09:21 PM 7/5/97 -0400, "Amos J. Danube" in "Re: Hungarians Beware - Joe
is around! - " wrote:

>Finally I have discovered why Joe is so intent to prove his Hungarian
>ancestry: he can whine a lot and be  as pessimistic as any Hungarian.
>Or is this only a sympathy whining and pessimism?

Amos,

I, Szalai Jozsef, don't have to prove my Hungarian ancestry.  I know that
my name isn't as Hungarian as "Amos J. Danube", but it's the only name I
have.  How about you, Amos?

Joe Szalai

At 11:09 PM 7/4/97 -0300, Aniko Dunford wrote:

>In reading this, I am left to wonder as to which era if not continent you
>are actually living in... When do you recall it was that unions have
>actually bowed down to a "push wages down" trend? ...  Or for that matter,
>when was the last time you recall, that private enterprise engaged in such
>a practice?

After reading Aniko's response, it becomes clear why social change will
take a long time.  It seems that the very basics of the economy have to be
explained to her.

Aniko,

When an employee gets a 2 per cent wage increase and the 'cost of living'
increases by 5 per cent, is the employee better off?  It's a simple
question and your respsonse seems to indicate that, yes, the employee is
better off.  Think about it again.  It's not that difficult of a concept.

Joe Szalai

"By bourgeoisie is meant the class of modern capitalists, owners of the
means of social production and employers of wage labor. By proletariat, the
class of modern wage laborers who, having no means of production of their
own, are reduced to selling their labor power in order to live."
         -- Friedrich Engels

At 06:30 PM 7/6/97 -0400, you wrote:
>"subscribe all" wrote:
>
>>I sincerley wish,good luck to Bela Liptak,who apparently does not have
>>anything else to do,just pester the List with his constant demands for
>action.
>>Personaly once I see his name on my mail,I just automaticly delete them.
>
>And there may be others on this list who automatically delete anything such
>as the above half-literate tirade.
>
>Ferenc
>
>Please you total literate just do so.You seems to be on cloud nine ferenc.
Just stay there with your smirk,and smut.
Andy Kozma

Toronto.

the 12 november 1884. If somoene have more information please mail-me.
Sorry my english is very poor.
I thank you in advance for your kind co-operation.

Francis Sudan
Les Planchettes
1644 Avry-devant-Pont (Suisse)
e-mail: